Sunday 22 February 2015

A Different Class(ification): Distinguishing Diversification in My Portfolio

Diversification is a very important element in my current investment activity. By spreading my investing funds across a number of industries and sectors I hope to "iron out" some of the markets intriguing movements and insulate myself from any particularly poor period in any one sector or industry.

As a result, I want to be able to accommodate some of the more cyclical industries with their potential for bigger gains (and losses). However, I also want to steady the ship with some of the more resilient and stable industries.


I have originally used the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) in order to classify my investments. It appealed to me due to its simplicity. However, as I have moved on it has become clear that it simplicity does result in some disadvantages.

  1. Its simplicity often seems to result in it inadequately (and sometimes crudely) classify some companies.
  2. My favoured financial information source (FT.com) does not use GICS. Consequently, it takes a little more effort to use the classification of my portfolio to guide me to "underweight" industries.

As a result (the eagle-eyed amongst you may have already noticed), I have chosen to switch the classification breakdown of my portfolio on my "Holdings" page to the Industry Classification Benchmark.

For me the ICB classification system has the benefit of being more "specific" but not too unwieldy with it. It also is used (slightly modified, it seems) by the FT.

However, I have chiefly used only down to the sector level rather than sub-sector (that is drilling down deeper than I need currently or anticipate to need in the future).

Eventually I will use this to slowly but surely uncover some of the key industries and sectors* where I am "underweight" and then investigate companies in that sector to see if there are any appealing stocks.

As a result, this is how my classification table looks:

IndustrySupersectorSector
0001
Oil & Gas
0500
Oil & Gas
0530Oil & Gas Producers
0570Oil Equipment, Services & Distribution
0580Alternative Energy
1000
Basic Materials
1300Chemicals1350Chemicals
1700
Basic Resources
1730Forestry & Paper
1750Industrial Metals & Mining
1770Mining
2000
Industrials
2300Construction & Materials2350Construction & Materials
2700
Industrial Goods & Services
2710Aerospace & Defense
2720General Industrials
2730Electronic & Electrical Equipment
2750Industrial Engineering
2770Industrial Transportation
2790Support Services
3000
Consumer Goods
3300Automobiles & Parts3350Automobiles & Parts
3500
Food & Beverage
3530Beverages
3570Food Producers
3700
Personal & Household Goods
3720Household Goods & Home Construction
3740Leisure Goods
3760Personal Goods
3780Tobacco
4000
Health Care
4500
Health Care
4530Health Care Equipment & Services
4570Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
5000
Consumer Services
5300
Retail
5330Food & Drug Retailers
5370General Retailers
5500Media5550Media
5700Travel & Leisure5750Travel & Leisure
6000
Telecoms
6500
Telecoms
6530Fixed Line Telecoms
6570Mobile Telecoms
7000
Utilities
7500
Utilities
7530Electricity
7570Gas, Water & Multiutilities
8000
Financials
8300Banks8350Banks
8500
Insurance
8530Nonlife Insurance
8570Life Insurance
8600
Real Estate
8630Real Estate Investment & Services
8670Real Estate Investment Trusts
8700Financial Services8770Financial Services
8900
Investment Instruments
8980Equity Investment Instruments
8990Non-Equity Investment Instruments
9000
Technology
9500
Technology
9530Software & Computer Services
9570Technology Hardware & Equipment

Notes

*Incidentally, to add a little confusion. GICS uses as its highest classification level "sector". In contrast, ICB uses "industry". This is somewhat annoying but not a great issue.

[Creative Commons image reproduced from Flickr user Glynlowe]


Want to keep up to date with the Dividend Drive? You can subscribe by email or follow me on Twitter.

No comments:

Post a Comment